last Thursday is my final class with Mr. Kamar which i think there is when i when to my fullest capabilities in talking. that day was seriously fun as some of my friend have to go in frond and present on the rants that specifically written in the slide, well we could choose it. the last best record was set by another class which is wafi and his group and the time almost 3 minutes. as for my class, haikal is the first one who set the bench(time) for our class. then there goes seri talking about bieber fever for about 4 minutes. seri could talk actually like forever on that topic but she just stop at that time considering we had the other class beaten. after that it's my turn to talk on cafe, sometimes when i think back on what i did said, it was gross.

though it look like what we were doing is a little fun games, it is actually a rants were as Mr. kamar said, rather used a direct and stress way of expressing our emotion why don''t we try on a new way which is rants. then there goes our day of using it.

Jeff Goodell who was born and raised in Silicon Valley is an American author, an editor at Russian literary journal and a technical writer at Apple. He graduated from University of California in English and has MFA in Fiction Writing from Columbia University. then he wrote and article that is steve job nobody knew, which is after steve gone. jeff goodell also is an investigator journalist and also a Steve Jobs worker. In this article Goodell reveal the man behind a mask name Steve Jobs.


a little facts on steve jobs is that Steven Paul Jobs was born on February 24, 1955, to Joanne Simpson and Abdulfattah "John" Jandali, two University of Wisconsin graduate students who gave their unnamed son up for adoption. His father, Abdulfattah Jandali, was a Syrian political science professor and his mother, Joanne Simpson, worked as a speech therapist. After he did enroll in high school, Jobs spent his free time at Hewlett-Packard. It was there that he befriended computer club guru Steve Wozniak. Wozniak was a brilliant computer engineer, and the two developed great respect for one another.

After high school, Jobs enrolled at Reed College in Portland, Oregon. Lacking direction, he dropped out of college after six months and spent the next 18 months dropping in on creative classes. Jobs later recounted how one course in calligraphy developed his love of typography.

then after ho got his hand on the company apple, his behavior started to change as many of his comrade did not recognizes him at the end. for example steve wozniak, an easy understanding of this matter could be archieve if we watched on the pirate of the silicon valley.

another  one on the smuttttt........

Usual thing that happened when some women found out about their partner watched porn they might sulking for about two to three days, which conclude that, watching porn does have effect on their emotion. Some of the boyfriend also messed up their relation by urging in asking for sex from their partner.

 Therefore, one most common concern about pornography is that it indirectly hurts women by encouraging sexism, raising sexual expectations and thereby harming relationships and might. Some people worry that it might even incite violence against women. The data, however, do not support these claims. “There’s absolutely no evidence that pornography does anything negative,” says Milton Diamond, director of the Pacific Center for Sex and Society at the University of Hawaii at Manoa. “It’s a moral issue, not a factual issue.”

To indicate that porn does not harm relationships, Moyer looks at studies that take the porn users’ side of the equation (their reports of sexual satisfaction and intimacy), as if that is sufficient to indicate that relationships are not harmed by porn. She ignores other research that indicates wives and girlfriends report being deeply hurt by their boyfriends’ or husbands’ porn use.

I've recently come across some data they may shed some light on the subject of pornography, and its potential negative effects/outcomes which is also from some other writer. "Viewing images of sexually attractive women and men may lead people to devalue their own partners and relationships." (Kenrick & Gutierres, 1980; Kenrick et al.,1989) Furthermore, "viewing X-rated sex films similarly tends to diminish people's satisfaction with their own sexual partner." (Zillman, 1989) "Reading or watching erotica may create expectations that few men and women can fulfill." (Myers, 2010)

Sunny side of smut

I would say that this was an interesting topic where we were talking about pornography. In ‘sex in bits and bytes,’ by Hal Arkowiz and Scot O. Lilienfeld, they said that over intake or watching or consumption of pornography will lead to a problem in relationship. As for our knowledge that being transfer within our society, sex or smut or pornography is not a good buddy to befriend with. In advance, the thing that what has been told from our ancestor is that keep our selves away from it. Even in our religion did mention to us to beware on pornography and stay our distance on men and women.

Sunny side of smut was written by Melinda Wenner Moyer a freelance science and health writer based in Brooklyn, New York. Recently she has been writing for Scientific American, Nature Medicine, Slate, Bon Appetit, Glamour, Better Homes and Gardens, and O: The Oprah Magazine

 One would say that, this topic is nonsense. Are we saying here we are allowing others to promote themselves or becoming porn actor/actress? Or are we going to legalized pornography just in order to suppress other desire? For me that not like it. Just take a look on the other side that being written in the article itself, the existence of the porn video itself actually in other hand is helping hand toward the consumer to lower down their intention to do the actual thing. 

In the nutshell, for me, some information got its true and false vary on how the we the reader translate it, sometime it may be bad but it also has it bright side.

Syllogism.

Syllogisms, which stem from deductive reasoning, are relatively simple forms of logical argument in which a conclusion is inferred by two premises. Aristotle, who established the foundation of formal logic, was the first to create a syllogism. Syllogisms are quite simple in structure. They consist of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion. Each part of a syllogism contains 2 categorical terms and the conclusion has one term in common with each premise. Each premise, in turn, is in the form "some/all A belong to B," or "some/all A is/are [not] B," where A and B are both terms. Also, the premises and conclusion can be of four types.(it is way more easy when my lecturer taught me)

Aristotle concluded that there was 256 syllogisms, or as Aristotle called them moods. However, out of 256 only 24 are valid. Once all of the valid moods were determined Aristotle reasoned that we could obtain information about any discipline and eventually all human knowledge in the world. However, research in this area has proven that syllogisms require lots of cognitive effort. As many as 50% or more get the validity of syllogisms wrong. People have trouble with the negatives as well as with the particulars. Also, research indicates that spatial and verbal responders approach syllogisms very differently. Aristotle thought that this was the way humans logically processed information. Even though this might work for simple arguments it is far too difficult to apply to more difficult reasoning, which we perform every day.

While in the class with Mr. Mark, he gave us maybe I could say mini games in order for us to fully understand the topic, not to mention while we were wearing toga. The class turns out like we are being the actor who re-acts on the day Julius ceaser got killed. also for and interesting leaning you guys could also search for a cartoon julius ceaser where it is more interesting. 

As from what my lecturer told me, jack the ripper was the first ever serial killer cases happened in human history in Whitechapel London, which then what made it famous. Furthermore, the mysteriously missing of culprit till today also made many parties wonder on the case. However, from so, there were many opinion and interesting responses that we could find regarding it.

In jack the ripper murder cases, I have heard many responses in their opinion on who might actually be jack the ripper himself. One of it is, it actually done by royalty which is Prince Albert (eddy) to cover up their doing at the time where the prince actually happened to have sex with one of the conical five victims that they afraid they would appear to have offspring. He also suffered syphilis which said to be affected by his illegal mate, in so made him angry and suffered a mental damage that create a reason for him to kill the prostitute. 

The Knight theory, though interesting and entertaining in its own way, has been effectively debunked by many Ripperologists. Most notable was Rumbelow's refutation in his revised edition of Jack the Ripper: The Complete Casebook where Rumbelow provides evidence that Annie lived longer than Knight claims, spent time after 1888 in workhouses, and had Alice with her through some of this time. There are no marriage or birth records listing Eddy as Annie's husband or as Alice's father. Other than that, there was never any hard evidence linking Eddy to Cleveland Street, Annie Crook, or even Walter Sickert. The lack of evidence, conspiracy theorists purport, proves the theory because all evidence was destroyed! Regardless of the legitimate criticisms, the Royal Conspiracy remains one of the most popular theories with several movies, novels, and graphic novels built around it.

In the end, it is difficult to consider Eddy a serious suspect. Although rumored, there is no concrete evidence that Eddy had mental problems (either through syphilis or any other reason), he is reported being out of the country during the murders, and no solid evidence has been produced that links Eddy to sexual relationships with either James Stephen or Annie Crook. Despite these facts, it appears likely that (outside of serious Ripper circles) the theory of Eddy's involvement in the murders in some way will never completely fade.

I have been thinking of my own theory regarding jack the ripper murder cases. Since that I find that these cases could sometime trigger the feeling of curiosity that lay dormant within me (detective Conan).from my background reading, most of the suspect back then, I would say they were all bind to all that has tendency in doing something like so (killing people) or that have a record in doing so (got thing to settle with prostitute). For example, James Kelly, George chapman, Aaron Kaminski and other that lined up after them. Like what I said, we take James Kelly for an example, we could see same pattern being used, and for example, James Kelly’s motive is where he found out that his wife is prostitute, then certain investigator said that James Kelly has a knife skill that he possesses when he work as upholsterer which then he could use to slew all his victim (including the conical five cases).  

This one is another interesting matter that I found in the internet not too long ago as that time in search for the defense attorney in the class. Here is some bibliography on her; Trow was born in Ferndale, Rhondda Cynon Taff, Wales. He went to Warwick School from 1961 to 1968. In 1968 he went to King's College, London, to read history. After graduation he spent a year at Jesus. In 1973 he married and in 1976 moved to the Isle of Wight where he works as a teacher of History and Politics at Ryde High School. Trow is a member of the Society of Authors and of the Crime Writers' Association. He has worked at Ryde High School for many years and is a well-known teacher and historian, and his old classroom has been renamed the 'Trow Suite' in honor of his teaching career at the school.

Trow is also known in some circles for his work in theatre and dramas, organizing and participating in many performances. He is known keenly for his impressions, dry wit and takes any chance to make fun of the French. He also jokes about the Welsh, despite being born in Wales.

Mei Trow used modern police forensic techniques, including psychological and geographical profiling, to identify Robert Mann, a morgue attendant, as the killer. His theory, the result of two years intensive research, is explored in a Discovery Channel documentary, Jack the Ripper: Killer Revealed.

Trow's research is rooted in information from a 1988 FBI examination of the Ripper case, which had worked up a comprehensive criminal personality profile. The portrait drawn up of Jack was as a white male from the lower social classes, most likely the product of a broken home.

It was also thought he would have had a menial job but with some anatomical knowledge, something like a butcher, mortuary or medical examiner's assistant or hospital attendant.